CATALYST PLANET - World Cup Controversy: Should Qatar Be Hosting FIFA 2022?

Ahead of the FIFA World Cup this November, Qatar has been the center of much controversy surrounding workers rights and the environmental impacts of their new stadiums.

The official ‘Adidas Telstar Mechta’ ball during the handover ceremony of the 2022 FIFA World Cup host mantle. Alneth. CC BY 2.0.

From high temperatures to Qatar's rather questionable human rights record, there has been a public outcry over FIFA’s refusal to remove the upcoming tournament from the Gulf state, despite issuing numerous vague statements that they were considering the change. There has been extensive controversy about why the second-biggest sporting event in the world after the Olympics should be held in a location which has outwardly expressed homophobic attitudes and in seven air-conditioned stadiums built by exploited migrant workers.

The criticism has all been exacerbated by the huge lack of viewer engagement the last time Qatar hosted such a major sporting event; stadiums during the 2019 World Athletics Championship were largely empty despite garnering a live viewership of 705,000 just two years prior. The economically unsustainability of the event—especially given that issues surrounding the rampant poverty and financial inequality in Qatar could have benefitted enormously from extra government funding and investment—have significantly lowered expectations for the upcoming World Cup.

A migrant worker cuts through a metal rod at a construction site for one of the football stadiums. ILO. CC BY-NC-ND 2.0.

The kafala labor system is a contractual form of labor sponsorship used in Qatar through which migrant workers are connected with a kafeel (sponsor) who manages their immigration status. Because the kafeel has ultimate authority over their workers, many of whom traveled from across Southeast Asia specifically for the construction of the stadiums, they face exploitation in the form of dangerous working conditions and insufficient wages. Increased international attention has pressured the Qatari government into passing various reforms to the system, but such changes to policy rarely come into effect in a timely manner.

Another major point of controversy has centered around the negative environmental impacts of constructing indoor, air-conditioned stadiums in the middle of the desert. On November 26, Qatar unveiled Stadium 974 to eager fans, a venue named for the number of recycled shipping containers used to construct the stadium. Despite FIFA’s extensive praise of this project, they have been accused of using it as a greenwashing exercise to divert attention away from the fact that Qatar’s climate necessitates the other seven stadiums to be artificially cooled. This will increase the country’s carbon footprint, which is already amongst the highest in the world due to its largely oil-based economy. Many critics have compared this to the backlash China received for using so much artificial snow when hosting the Winter Olympics in 2022. Environmental experts strongly believed that such environmentally harmful measures could have been avoided if the host nation chosen simply had a more suitable climate for the event, an argument they have extended to the upcoming World Cup as well.

Renovation of the Khalifa International Stadium in Doha. jbdodane. CC BY-NC 2.0.

While this is definitely not the first time a World Cup has been placed under such public scrutiny, previous controversies did not receive as much publicity as those in Qatar have. It begs the question of whether this is just because social consciousness is increasing in general or whether it has to do with the event being held in the Middle East—a longtime target of Western media. Either way, there is still a lot for FIFA and the Qatari government to address ahead of kickoff in November.