Nearly Extinct Rhino Species Found Only in Indonesia

July 26, 2022

The Javan Rhinoceros is one of the world’s most endangered species, with only sixty remaining in Indonesia’s Ujung Kulon National Park.

Javan rhino. Courtesy of Indonesian Ministry of Environment/Forestry.

Javan Rhinoceroses used to be common throughout the continent of Asia, until poaching and habitat loss dwindled the population down to what is now a mere 60-68 rhinos, all found in Ujung Kulon National Park in Indonesia. The poaching of Javan rhinos largely began in colonial times, with the animal being a trophy for hunters. Now, the rhinos are poached primarily for their horns, which are extremely expensive and are sometimes used as status symbols among the extremely wealthy. Javan rhinos were declared extinct in Vietnam in 2010, when the last rhino in the country was poached, and now the only surviving Javan rhinos exist in Indonesia.

While poaching Javan rhinos is illegal, and they are considered a protected endangered species, reviving the population presents a major challenge for two main reasons. The first is that the extremely small number of surviving Javan rhinos doesn’t allow for much genetic diversity. The second issue is habitat loss as a result of both human intervention and natural disaster. Human activity near Ujung Kulon National Park has interfered with the rhinos’ natural habitats, and the push for more property development in the area threatens the security of the park. In terms of natural disasters threatening the rhinos’ last remaining habitat, the national park is located in an area that is susceptible to tsunamis and rising water levels as a result of climate change, and also happens to be near an active volcano, Anak Krakatau. Many conservationists are extremely nervous that if one of these natural disasters occured, all hope would be lost for the species even if there were a few survivors, because of the already miniscule genetic diversity within the population.

A member of the Rhino Protection Unit measures a Javan rhino’s footprint in Ujung Kulon National Park. U.S. Department of State. CC BY 2.0.

Even without the threat of natural disaster and human interference, Javan rhinos face an existing setback within their protected habitat. An invasive species called Arenga Palm grows in Ujung Kulon National Park. This plant blocks the sun, which prevents the plants that the rhinos eat from growing. The park has made clearing Arenga Palm a priority, but since it is an invasive species, eliminating it from the park entirely is not an easy task.

Ujung Kulon National Park does offer tours, providing an opportunity to ethically see the nearly extinct rhinos. However, since these tours are meant to be non-invasive, there is no guarantee that a Javan rhino will come into view during your time in the park. With that being said, tourists often see traces of the rhinos, such as footprints, like in the photo featured above.

Get Involved

The best way to get involved with this issue is to raise awareness and money for organizations working to sustain and increase the population of Javan Rhinoceros. Some of these organizations include World Wildlife, which is working on eliminating Arenga Palm and also hopes to one day transfer some Javan rhinos to an area which is not in the danger zone of the volcano Anak Krakatau. Another good organization to support is the International Rhino Foundation, which works directly with the staff of Ujung Kulon National Park. On a more general level, raising awareness about climate change and supporting organizations which respond to extreme weather is a way to get involved with this issue as well as many others, as climate change has only compounded the plight of the Javan Rhinoceros.

The Danger of Selective Dog Breeding

July 11, 2022

Selective breeding has produced many of the dog breeds we know and love today, but also poses a serious threat to their safety.

Great Danes are selectively bred in order to maintain their large size. Paul Brennan. CC0.

Out of the over 300 dog breeds alive today, many are the result of a process called selective breeding. Dating back almost 200 years, the practice has resulted in many of these breeds developing significant health problems as a result of their breeding. Breeders bred dogs to create or accentuate physical characteristics that were considered aesthetically pleasing to their customers, like the tiny physiques of toy and teacup poodles or the flat faces of French bulldogs.

Selective breeding describes the specific selection of dogs to mate in order to produce a litter with specific traits. In theory, this will allow breeders to add, remove or change various characteristics of the offspring depending on what their clients are looking for. This, of course, takes place in contrast to natural breeding which is when the mating process between the dogs is left up to them.

A newborn litter of purebred St Bernard puppies at a breeding center. Royvon. CC BY-NC 2.0.

The motivations behind selective breeding fall broadly into two categories, the first being the desire to breed purebred dogs. In order to have a litter of purebred puppies, breeders must ensure that both parents come from pure lineages of the breed in question. This type of breeding largely occurs when buyers are looking to show their dogs at competitions, although some may simply have a preference for purebreds.

The second main cause of selective breeding has to do with the addition, removal or reinforcement of certain traits. By mating a dog that displays a certain dominant trait with one that doesn’t, breeders can introduce the trait into the lineage. Similarly, if breeders are trying to produce dogs that are specifically skilled in certain areas -- hunting, trainability or strength, for example -- they will likely choose to mate dogs that display these traits in order for the offspring to receive them as well. Conversely, by mating a dog with an undesirable trait with a dog that doesn’t, it will be much less likely for the offspring to display the trait. This last technique is often done when breeders are trying to remove traits for certain heritable diseases.

Teacup poodles are the product of selective breeding and are also at risk of a large variety of health problems because of their miniature size. Animal Corner. CC BY-NC-ND 2.0.

While there can be benefits to selective breeding like preventing the inheritance of certain disease-causing genetic traits, the process is still a very controversial one because of the many dangers associated with it. Most prominently among these are the many unethical breeders who treat their dogs very badly in order to maximize the production of offspring. Because selective breeding can be a very lucrative business, especially when producing purebred puppies that will go on to compete, it is extremely important to choose a breeder who prioritizes the health and safety of the dogs over their profit. It is also very important to find breeders who don’t engage in inbreeding (forcing dogs who are related to one another to mate), as this can cause a variety of health problems ranging from decreased immunity to genetic disorders.

Bulldogs are one of the many breeds of dog that have arisen from selective breeding. Stockvault. CC0.

Breeding dogs that are too genetically similar can also worsen pre-existing health conditions in the parent dogs. A very common example of this occurs in bulldogs which were selectively bred in order to accentuate their stout physiques. Their skulls were enlarged, snouts and legs shortened and underbite exaggerated, all to produce a dog that looked appealing to customers. The breeding is so extreme that almost 95% of bulldog births must be achieved by Cesarean section because the puppies’ heads are too large for the mother to give birth naturally. Their flattened faces tend to cause respiratory problems, while their excessive folds of skin can result in skin infections and eyelid problems. Their forcibly shortened limbs and tails often develop joint problems, and their eyesight may also be compromised due to the weight of the excessive skin around their faces.

All of these health issues can be directly traced back to the selective breeding that created the breed in the first place, and bulldogs are just one of many such examples. Until money stops flowing into the industry however, putting a complete end to selective breeding will prove extremely difficult.

TO GET INVOLVED

Many animal rights groups have long been advocating for the end of selective breeding given the potential risk to the dogs. Prominent among these are People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), a group which has long demonstrated against animal abuse and the wrongful breeding practices. The Dog Breeding Reform Group (DBRG) has published a number of welfare reports on the state of dog breeding in the UK. The Universities Federation for Animal Welfare (UFAW) also provides a number of resources to prospective pet owners about the dangers of selective breeding and better alternatives.

To discover more about PETA’s position, click here.

To read the DBRG’s welfare reports, click here.

To explore the UFAW’s resources, click here.

Animal Activists Celebrate as More of Asia Bans Dog Meat Consumption

10 Animal Festivals From Around the World That You’ve Likely Never Heard Of

Entertainment or Exploitation? Dive Into Sea Mammals in Captivity

March 16, 2022

Marine mammals living in captivity may appear happy and healthy, but the harsh reality is the aquatic entertainment industry exploits the animals for profit. Here’s why they deserve to roam free.

Orca show at SeaWorld. roger4336. CC BY-SA 2.0

The definition of a cetacean is a marine mammal, but they are better known as dolphins, porpoises and whales. While not everyone has viewed these creatures in their natural habitats, there is a good chance they have been seen closer to home at a local zoo or aquatic institution. However, these businesses are in possession of cetaceans for entertainment purposes, not the well-being of the actual animals.

As breathtaking as it may be to see an orca, whale, or dolphin right in front of your face, these creatures have complex ways of thinking and living that cannot be maintained in a glass tank. Cetaceans are social animals, similar to humans, who thrive off interacting with other aquatic mammals. They are also extremely intelligent and need space to explore new concepts and create families. If kept in captivity and separated from their offspring, cetaceans suffer similarly to what a human may experience if they are depressed or anxious: physical ailments, raised stress levels, aggressive temperaments and even premature death. As a result, this changes the demeanor of the animals, and several trainers have been injured or killed over the years. Organizations using cetaceans for entertainment purposes overlook the basic needs of these animals and forgo moral and ethical standards for the benefit of their business.

SeaWorld is famous for its orca shows, dazzling spectators with what seem to be displays of happy creatures performing tricks willingly but are truly a collection of unhappy animals working for food in unsuitable tanks. Years of cetacean exploitation in this organization—and ones similar to it—were masked as research. SeaWorld claimed to save marine animals who had been injured in the wild by bringing them to their facility and rehabilitating them in a controlled environment. Upon further investigation, these claims were false, as some animals had been forcefully taken from their homes rather than rescued. Companies battled with lawmakers for years over the proposal of a law that would benefit the animals more than the humans in charge of them. The Orca Protection and Safety Act was passed in 2016, banning the breeding, capturing and performing of orcas in California. SeaWorld’s long reign amongst aquatic entertainment organizations crumbled.

While several states have adopted laws banning the breeding of orcas since then, there are still 59 whales in captivity across the globe and numerous other dolphins and beluga whales in the same situation. In recent years, China and Russia have become popular locations for orca breeding and performing.

One organization in Canada is now working to rectify the unethical treatment of these animals by creating a space for them to retire and return to the life a cetacean would normally live. The Whale Sanctuary Project is dedicating their time to supporting cetaceans bred and raised in captivity who may be retired, but have no home or family to return to. The Whale Sanctuary Project creates authentic sanctuaries for these animals, large bodies of water with adequate depth where whales, dolphins and porpoises can roam free and interact with other creatures in the same situation. Their work is the first of its kind in North America and will continue to improve the lives of cetaceans in need for years to come.

GET INVOLVED

Orca Network is a non-profit organization working to spread awareness about orca whales and other aquatic mammals living in captivity. To learn more about orcas, the effects living in captivity has on marine mammals and ways you can directly support these animals, visit Orca Network’s website and consider attending one of their virtual informational events.

The Dark Side of Elephant Rides

December 11, 2020

Most of us have had the opportunity to marvel at the world’s most gentle giants, elephants, whether in a zoo, at a circus, or maybe even on a safari. These animals are often used for human entertainment, but at what cost? For the elephants forced to carry humans for hours at a time, the cost may be their lives.

Elephant riding, a practice popular in places like Thailand, has become a regular bucket list item with influencers sparking inspiration atop the majestic animals. While it may seem that these animals are physically equipped, their bodies are simply not meant for such long hauls. In addition, the inadequate living conditions and harsh treatments they are subjected to are all the more reason to refuse elephant rides.

Their mistreatment starts with “phajaan,” or elephant crushing. This training method consists of taking the elephants from their mothers and confining them in a small space. When they are in captivity, they are beaten to submission with bullhooks and nail-spiked bamboo sticks. In combination with the physical abuse they have to endure, elephants are also deprived of sleep and food, then chained when they are not giving rides. By participating in elephant tours, one may unknowingly contribute to this brutal cycle of abuse.

Elephant in chains. Invisible Lens Photography. CC BY-NC-SA 2.0.

This physical abuse also leads to health complications for the elephants. Their bodies are weakened by the trauma, and the hundreds of pounds placed on the center of their spines often leads to permanent spinal injuries. Not only is the human weight an unnatural stress, but the chair, or “howdah,” attached to their backs can rub against their skin, causing open wounds that get infected. It is apparent that the consequences of elephant riding are incredibly harmful.

Some organizations have begun taking steps to remedy this issue. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals and World Animal Protection created mass media campaigns denouncing elephant riding that have gained significant traction. These campaigns showed graphic images of elephants as young as 18 to 24 months old being chained up and beaten with bullhooks: a small glimpse into these animals’ harsh realities. Tour operators like STA Travel, TUI Group, G Adventures and Intrepid Travel have also contributed to ensuring animal safety with their elimination of most elephant activities.

Even though elephant riding may seem fun, the unethical practices behind it must be resolved in order to keep this endangered species alive and treated well.

Animal Activists Celebrate as More of Asia Bans Dog Meat Consumption

July 16, 2020

The eating of dog meat, though not widespread anymore, is still practiced today in countries such as South Korea, China, Vietnam, Thailand and Cambodia. 30 million dogs are killed for consumption every year in Asia, motivating animal rights activists to speak up and call for change. Many have pushed back against the practice, finding success in the last few weeks as the first Cambodian province and India’s Nagaland state ban the selling, trading and consumption of dog meat. This marks a crucial turning point for animal rights activists across the world.

Siem Reap - The “Hub” of Dog Meat

While only about 12% of Cambodians eat dog meat on a regular basis, the province of Siem Reap has been identified as a “hot spot” for the trading and consumption of dog meat in wet markets. Tea Kimsoth, head of Siem Reap province’s agriculture, forestry and fisheries department, stated that “dog meat has been a lot more popular following the arrivals of foreigners, especially among the South Koreans.” On July 8, Siem Reap became the first province in Cambodia to mark the practice as illegal. Consequences of defying the ban include up to five years in prison and $12,200 in fines. The implementation of the law banning dog meat consumption marks a victory for the Humane Society International (HSI), which hopes that Siem Reap will serve as a model for the rest of the country to save the lives of millions of dogs.

Nagaland, India - Following Suit

After pictures of “dogs bound in sacks at wet markets” circulated online, the Federation of Indian Animal Protection Organisations called for change and headed a campaign to stop the illegal trading and slaughtering of the animals. However, many civil rights activists retaliated against the ban, calling it “an attack on food customs in the state.” While illegal in some parts of India, dog meat is still considered a delicacy by some in the northeastern areas of the country. The government has not revealed how it plans to enforce the ban, but it announced that it would also ban commercial importation, trading and dog markets in general. This comes as a relief to HSI, which has been campaigning for years to stop the consumption and slaughtering of dogs.

The Movement Continued

These victories come in light of the decision by Shenzhen, China, to ban the eating of both dogs and cats. This makes Shenzhen the first Chinese city to do so, after beginning to enforce the decision on May 1. Ultimately, the eating of dog meat is not common in China, only practiced by a few with the majority stating they have never tried it and never will. This comes after the city government released a statement saying that “dogs and cats have established a much closer relationship with humans than all other animals.” The city followed suit after Hong Kong and Taiwan banned the practice.

In the meantime, organizations such as the Humane Society International and People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals are celebrating their success while working constantly to target other countries where the practice is still prevalent.